Research Studies & Reports
DMV’s Research & Development Branch has been conducting research and producing studies and reports since the 1950s. Research & Development reports help DMV to measure the impact of new laws on making drivers safer. We also identify areas where we can improve our processes, explore new approaches to solving existing problems, and branch out into new opportunities to serve you better.
Studies & Reports Sections
Studies and reports are assigned to a Section that best describes the type of report. Click on a section title below to see a short description.
I. Driver Education & Training Studies
II. Driver Licensing Screening Studies
III. Studies on Improvement and Control of Deviant Drivers
IV. Basic Research & Methodological Studies: Driver Performance, Accident Etiology, Prediction Models, and Actuarial Applications
V. Driver Licensing / Control Systems & Safety Management Studies
VI. Studies on Special Driver Populations
VII. Miscellaneous Studies & Reports
Request printed copies of studies and reports by mail at:
Department of Motor Vehicles
Research and Development Branch
2415 1st Ave. Mail Station: F-126
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 914-8125
Please include the report number, the number of copies requested, and your name, address, and phone number.
Report ID | Date Published | Title | Section | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|
08 | 1961/ 02 |
Control of the Negligent Driver–Part I: Characteristics of Negligent DriversTo discover if there are characteristics differentiating negligent drivers from the "average" driver, and if relationships exist between actual driving performance and mileage driven, occupation, age, or sex. |
III | |
87.1 | 1983/ 08 |
An Abstract of The Traffic Safety Impact of California’s New Drunk Driving Law (AB 541)- An Evaluation of the First Nine Months of ExperienceTo determine if the new drunk driving law (AB 541) had any impact on the incidence of alcoholrelated traffic accidents. |
III | |
97 | 1986/ 01 |
The California DUI Countermeasure System: An Evaluation of System Processing and Deficiencies. (Volume 5 of “An Evaluation of the California Drunk Driving Countermeasure System”)Specific objectives of this study were: (1) identification of deficiencies in the California DUI countermeasure system, and (2) evaluation of the frequency with which DUI offenders avoid timely processing or circumvent system countermeasures due to these deficiencies. The general objective of the study was to empirically describe and analyze the flow of DUI offenders through the DUI countermeasure system. |
III | |
NRN022 | 1981/ 01 |
The Sanctioning Process and the DUI OffenderTo increase knowledge and awareness of the state-of-the-art of drunk driver sanction effectiveness. |
III | |
NRN024, NRN025, NRN026, NRN027, NRN028, NRN029, NRN030 | 2020/ 04 |
Post Licensing Control Reporting and Evaluation System (PLCRES): Negligent Operator Program Costs and EffectivenessTo implement and maintain an automated on-line evaluation system tor monitoring the effectiveness of negligent-operator programs. |
III | |
NRN031 | 1986/ 06 |
Accident Rates, Financial Responsibility, and Restriction Compliance of SB-38 ParticipantsTo collect data regarding the accident rates, financial responsibility, and restriction compliance of SB-38 alcohol treatment program participants, in response to a legislative proposal requiring proof of financial responsibility for SB-38 program participants. |
III | |
102 110 115 117 128 137 | 2020/ 04 |
Negligent-Operator Treatment Evaluation System (NOTES): Program Effectiveness Reports |
III | |
104 | 1986/ 01 |
An Evaluation of the Impact of a Warning Letter for First-Time DUI Offenders (Volume 6 of “An Evaluation of the California Drunk Driving Countermeasure System”)To develop, implement, and evaluate a package consisting of a warning letter and pamphlet suitable for the first-DUI offender. |
III | |
107 | 1986/ 05 |
An Evaluation of the California Habitual Traffic Offender LawTo evaluate the California habitual traffic offender law (AB 3529 - Mountjoy) interms of: (1) the number of habitual traffic offenders (HTO) identified, (2) their prosecution and conviction rates, and (3) the degree of traffic safety risk posed by HTOs |
III | |
11 | 1962/ 10 |
Control of the Negligent Driver–Part II: Driving Performance of Negligent DriversTo make thorough and comparative analyses of performance of negligent drivers before and after departmental action, and of the differences, if any, associated with age, type of action taken, mileage driven, occupation, sex, type of license, and other factors or combinations of factors. |
III |