Research Studies & Reports

DMV’s Research & Development Branch has been conducting research and producing studies and reports since the 1950s. Research & Development reports help DMV to measure the impact of new laws on making drivers safer. We also identify areas where we can improve our processes, explore new approaches to solving existing problems, and branch out into new opportunities to serve you better. 

Request printed copies of studies and reports by mail at:

Department of Motor Vehicles
Research and Development Branch
2415 1st Ave. Mail Station: F-126
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 914-8125

Please include the report number, the number of copies requested, and your name, address, and phone number.

393 Results

Report ID Date Published Title Section Links
36 1971/ 03

Modifying Negligent Driving Behavior: Evaluation of Selected Driver Improvement Techniques

By: William C. Marsh

To compare and evaluate eight different methods of dealing with negligent drivers.

III
30 1969/ 08

Modifying Negligent Driving Behavior Through Warning Letters

By: Robin S. McBride & Raymond C. Peck

To investigate the relative impact of various types of warning letters on the subsequent driving record of negligent drivers. Levels of threat and intimacy were manipulated.

III
13 1963/ 03

Migration to California

By: Ronald S. Coppin & G. van Oldenbeek

Through a survey, to describe the origin, county of California residence, age, and sex composition of 31,358 households registering out-of-state vehicles in California.

VII
67 1978/ 09

Medically Impaired Drivers: An Evaluation of California Policy (Senate Bill 2033 – Garcia)

By: Mary K. Janke, Raymond C. Peck, & Dell R. Dreyer

To evaluate the Department's licensing policies and practices relative to drivers with mental or physical conditions which might affect their ability to drive safely.

VI
190 2001/ 05

Medical Conditions and Other Factors in Driver Risk

By: Mary K. Janke

This report addresses the effects of medical conditions and medications on the ability to operate a motor vehicle safely. It presents crash rates and crash odds ratios for broadly defined groups of drivers known to the Department of Motor Vehicles as having physical or mental conditions that potentially impair driving. It also reviews the scientific literature dealing with medical conditions and driving. Finally, the report briefly discusses a tiered assessment system under study by the department that holds promise for identifying and evaluating medically impaired drivers.

IV
NRN047 1972/ 11

Measuring Attitudinal Response to Several Types of Driver Improvement Techniques

By: Ronald R. Payne

To develop a quantified evaluation system for measuring subject-oriented psychological differences in response to treatment techniques.

IV
NRN076 1986/ 11

Mature Driver Core Curriculum Project Literature Review

By: Mary K. Janke

To review the technical literature on the driving performance of elderly people, as an aid to setting up the curriculum for California's Mature Driver Improvement Program.

VI
NRN052 1986/ 09

Marijuana and Alcohol: A Driver Performance Study

By: Alfred A. Biasotti, Patrice N. Boland, Calvin Mallory, Victor C. Reeve, DOJ; Raymond C. Peck, DMV

To determine the effects of marijuana, and marijuana in combination with alcohol, on driving performance.

IV
55 1976/ 06

Longitudinal Study of California Driver Accident Frequencies I: An Exploratory Multivariate Analysis

By: Karen W. Kwong, Jensen Kuan, & Raymond C. Peck

To attempt to develop an optimum accident-prediction system.

IV
106 1986/ 05

Licensing Novice Motorcyclists: A Comparison of the Traffic Safety Impact of California’s Standard Test and the MOST II (Motorcycle Operator Skill Test) Administered at Centralized Testing Offices

By: Shara Lynn Kelsey, Catherine Liddicoat, & Michael Ratz

To clarify issues raised in the Anderson et al. study, "Improved Motorcyclist Licensing and Testing Project," to answer the following two questions: 1) Would the MOST II reduce accidents and convictions when compared to California's standard skill test? 2) Would there be an accident reduction which was independent of the reduction in instruction permit and license issuance rates resulting from the inconvenience of being required to travel to another location to be tested?

II