Research Studies & Reports

DMV’s Research & Development Branch has been conducting research and producing studies and reports since the 1950s. Research & Development reports help DMV to measure the impact of new laws on making drivers safer. We also identify areas where we can improve our processes, explore new approaches to solving existing problems, and branch out into new opportunities to serve you better. 

Request printed copies of studies and reports by mail at:

Department of Motor Vehicles
Research and Development Branch
2415 1st Ave. Mail Station: F-126
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 914-8125

Please include the report number, the number of copies requested, and your name, address, and phone number.

393 Results

Report ID Date Published Title Section Links
70.1 1979/ 07

An Abstract of An Evaluation of Probation-by-Mail as an Alternative to Mandatory Hearing Attendance for Negligent Operators

By: Beverly R. Sherman & Michael Ratz

To evaluate the feasibility and traffic safety implications of placing negligent operators on probation by letter without the subjects being scheduled for a hearing.

III
75.1 1980/ 07

An Abstract of Suspension and Revocation Effects on the DUI Offender

By: Roger E. Hagen, Edward J. McConnell, & Rickey L. Williams

(1) To assess the ability of first, second, and third DUI offenders to avoid future DUI convictions or traffic accidents; (2) to survey drivers being reinstated following a DUI suspension or revocation in order to gather information concerning admission of driving during the action, transportation alternatives used while under the licensing action, and reactions of the driver to both the action and the changes in life style which resulted thereby; and (3) to assess the incidence of driving while under licensing action as reported by drivers themselves, and by the presence of any driver record update.

III
75 1980/ 07

Suspension and Revocation Effects on the DUI Offender

By: Roger E. Hagen, Edward J. McConnell, & Rickey L. Williams

(1) To assess the ability of first, second, and third DUI offenders to avoid future DUI convictions or traffic accidents; (2) to survey drivers being reinstated following a DUI suspension or revocation in order to gather information concerning admission of driving during the action, transportation alternatives used while under the licensing action, and reactions of the driver to both the action and the changes in life style which resulted thereby; and (3) to assess the incidence of driving while under licensing action as reported by drivers themselves, and by the presence of any driver record update.

III
77 1981/ 12

An Evaluation of Three Alternative Formats for Probation Violation Hearings

By: Rickey L. Williams & Roger E. Hagen

To develop and evaluate new formats hearings which incorporate behavior caseload-scheduling approach. for negligent operator probation violator modificatiol1 principles and a client

III
85.1 1983/ 06

An Abstract of Intervention Strategies for Accident-Involved Drivers: An Experimental Evaluation of Current California Policy and Alternatives

By: Clifford J. Helander

To evaluate standard and alternative strategies for selecting and treating accident-involved drivers in California.

III
85 1983/ 06

Intervention Strategies for Accident-Involved Drivers: An Experimental Evaluation of Current California Policy and Alternatives

By: Clifford J. Helander

To evaluate standard and alternative strategies for selecting and treating accident-involved drivers in California.

III
89 1984/ 03

Analysis of DUI Processing from Arrest Through Post-Conviction Countermeasures (Volume 1 of “An Evaluation of the California Drunk Driving Countermeasure System”)

By: M. W. Perrine

(1) To develop process flow charts for the whole DUI system, depicting all elements and decision points concerning drivers, abstracts, and license actions involved in the reporting system, both before and after new legislation (AB 541) became effective on January I, 1982; (2) to describe the whole DUI system from the point of arrest to the driver record file, both before and after AB 541; (3) to identify areas or sources of system inefficiency or modes of circumvention of specified provisions, especially in the post-AB 541 system; and (4) to develop alternate solutions and associated recommendations.

III
90 1984/ 04

The Long-Term Traffic Safety Impact of Pilot Alcohol Abuse Treatment as an Alternative to License Suspensions (Volume 2 of “An Evaluation of the California Drunk Driving Countermeasure System”)

By: Daniel D. Sadler & M. W. Perrine

To evaluate the long-term traffic safety effects of participating in a Senate Bill (SB) 330 drunk driver program in lieu of receiving a mandatory license suspension or revocation.

III
IR1 1987/ 08

Use of Proxy Measures in Evaluating Post licensing Control Treatments

By: Mary K. Janke & Raymond C. Peck

To describe and evaluate the usefulness of alternative (accident proxy) measures in traffic safety studies.

III
NRN033 1990/ 10

The Identification of High-Risk Drivers through Age-Mediated Point Systems

By: Michael A. Gebers & Raymond C. Peck

To determine if there is quantitative justification for applying age-mediated intervention programs to older drivers.

III